<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Experiments in Ecclesia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>what if it blew up?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:58:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts for Easter by cuyler</title>
		<link>http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/thoughts-for-easter/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>cuyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-50</guid>
		<description>things like easter and christmas i could care less about. people can argue those until they die and i won&#039;t be compelled to care anymore or less. what i mean by pagan influence is (and i&#039;m being careful to speak on stuff that i felt/saw before reading pagan christianity that has been confirmed by other sources, so as to not hold up a single book as the mark of sole truth on the matter) things like the hierarchy of clergy, division between the laity (a phrase i might not have used if i hadn&#039;t read PC, but mainly because it wouldn&#039;t have occurred to me as the phrase to use), the EXTREME veneration of saints and icons. i mean, paul calls us a priesthood, all of us, priests, and yet no church that i&#039;ve ever been to has given me that impression. sure, everyone&#039;s a priest... if they go through the proper training. i don&#039;t get this impression from paul or Jesus. things like elders - shouldn&#039;t they occur naturally as opposed to being requisite for a church to start? because that would mean that our church is wrong, and i don&#039;t see things that say people can&#039;t gather unless there&#039;s an elder. 

and the extreme veneration of the saints is blatantly polytheism, just given a sort of &quot;christian&quot; flavor. i lose my keys? i&#039;ll give some alms, light some candles, and pray to saint jehosophat, finder of stuff. i have a war to fight? i&#039;ll light some candles, give some alms, shoot a prayer and maybe sacrifice a ram if its handy to ares, god of war. exact same principle. and protestants have kind of taken this saint veneration, watered it down, and applied it to their preachers/pastors. &quot;he&#039;s so touched by God!&quot; which might be true, but he&#039;s no more touched than i, and pastors build followings around themselves, intentional and otherwise.

and i agree that the NT emphasizes the universality of God himself, and i guess what i meant is that Jesus&#039; teachings were aimed at jews primarily, then after his death, a jewish paul reached out to gentile greece. but, it wasn&#039;t so much that the old covenant disappeared and was being replaced by this dog gentile covenant, but rather, the dog gentile was being grafted into the old covenant, kind of. rather, God had struck the ultimate covenant with his people, and the gentiles were welcome to join. we were being grafted into the true vine.

and then i stopped to clip my fingernails and think, and then i lost what i was thinking. 

oh, i remember. so, while the focus shifted to a more universal approach, i don&#039;t think this negates their jewish roots. we aren&#039;t now the center of his covenant, the jews are still his chosen people, we&#039;re just given oppurtunity to participate it in with them, and they to participate more closely. paul admits this mystery. somehow we can all participate, yet somehow God still honors his old commitment.

so, that&#039;s what i was meaning in a nutshell. i need shower. bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>things like easter and christmas i could care less about. people can argue those until they die and i won&#8217;t be compelled to care anymore or less. what i mean by pagan influence is (and i&#8217;m being careful to speak on stuff that i felt/saw before reading pagan christianity that has been confirmed by other sources, so as to not hold up a single book as the mark of sole truth on the matter) things like the hierarchy of clergy, division between the laity (a phrase i might not have used if i hadn&#8217;t read PC, but mainly because it wouldn&#8217;t have occurred to me as the phrase to use), the EXTREME veneration of saints and icons. i mean, paul calls us a priesthood, all of us, priests, and yet no church that i&#8217;ve ever been to has given me that impression. sure, everyone&#8217;s a priest&#8230; if they go through the proper training. i don&#8217;t get this impression from paul or Jesus. things like elders &#8211; shouldn&#8217;t they occur naturally as opposed to being requisite for a church to start? because that would mean that our church is wrong, and i don&#8217;t see things that say people can&#8217;t gather unless there&#8217;s an elder. </p>
<p>and the extreme veneration of the saints is blatantly polytheism, just given a sort of &#8220;christian&#8221; flavor. i lose my keys? i&#8217;ll give some alms, light some candles, and pray to saint jehosophat, finder of stuff. i have a war to fight? i&#8217;ll light some candles, give some alms, shoot a prayer and maybe sacrifice a ram if its handy to ares, god of war. exact same principle. and protestants have kind of taken this saint veneration, watered it down, and applied it to their preachers/pastors. &#8220;he&#8217;s so touched by God!&#8221; which might be true, but he&#8217;s no more touched than i, and pastors build followings around themselves, intentional and otherwise.</p>
<p>and i agree that the NT emphasizes the universality of God himself, and i guess what i meant is that Jesus&#8217; teachings were aimed at jews primarily, then after his death, a jewish paul reached out to gentile greece. but, it wasn&#8217;t so much that the old covenant disappeared and was being replaced by this dog gentile covenant, but rather, the dog gentile was being grafted into the old covenant, kind of. rather, God had struck the ultimate covenant with his people, and the gentiles were welcome to join. we were being grafted into the true vine.</p>
<p>and then i stopped to clip my fingernails and think, and then i lost what i was thinking. </p>
<p>oh, i remember. so, while the focus shifted to a more universal approach, i don&#8217;t think this negates their jewish roots. we aren&#8217;t now the center of his covenant, the jews are still his chosen people, we&#8217;re just given oppurtunity to participate it in with them, and they to participate more closely. paul admits this mystery. somehow we can all participate, yet somehow God still honors his old commitment.</p>
<p>so, that&#8217;s what i was meaning in a nutshell. i need shower. bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts for Easter by scochenour</title>
		<link>http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/thoughts-for-easter/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>scochenour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-49</guid>
		<description>cuyler- 

I know, from previous conversations, that you haven&#039;t been &quot;too keen&quot; on any kind of authoritative church history or leadership, but I was wondering what are some of the pagan influences that you have seen developed through out the church?  I guess I&#039;m not quite sure what you mean when you say that.  Is it the same line of arguments that argue against celebrating Christmas and Easter?  I would be interested to hear more of you thoughts on that.

I agree that your first and second point are much the same, and I would offer that the shift from a Jewish centered to Greek centered gospel was inevitable.  While the Old Testament shows us  the history of the true God and his relationship with his people, there does become of shift in the New Testament.  I think that much of this has to do with the revelation that God&#039;s people are not limited to the nation of Israel anymore, but that through Jesus&#039; sacrifice we gentiles are adopted into God&#039;s family.  Paul sets out to preach the good news to the gentiles, using Greek language because that what was what they were speaking.  

You said that, &quot;but fact is, everything in the bible is aimed primarily at a jewish people.&quot;  and I think I will have to disagree with you here.  I think that we could separate the Old Testament from the New and say that the Old speaks to the Jewish people and the New speaks to the gentiles (or perhaps, to a more universal audience.)  but I think that everything in the Bible is aimed and God&#039;s people.  At times the words are guided towards the Jewish nation and other times it is spoken to a Greek audience, but is always being spoken to God&#039;s people.

I realize that I often sound like I think I have everything figured out, I&#039;m sorry if that has been the tone of my reply.  It&#039;s not what I intended.  I am interested in your thoughts on the pagan influences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cuyler- </p>
<p>I know, from previous conversations, that you haven&#8217;t been &#8220;too keen&#8221; on any kind of authoritative church history or leadership, but I was wondering what are some of the pagan influences that you have seen developed through out the church?  I guess I&#8217;m not quite sure what you mean when you say that.  Is it the same line of arguments that argue against celebrating Christmas and Easter?  I would be interested to hear more of you thoughts on that.</p>
<p>I agree that your first and second point are much the same, and I would offer that the shift from a Jewish centered to Greek centered gospel was inevitable.  While the Old Testament shows us  the history of the true God and his relationship with his people, there does become of shift in the New Testament.  I think that much of this has to do with the revelation that God&#8217;s people are not limited to the nation of Israel anymore, but that through Jesus&#8217; sacrifice we gentiles are adopted into God&#8217;s family.  Paul sets out to preach the good news to the gentiles, using Greek language because that what was what they were speaking.  </p>
<p>You said that, &#8220;but fact is, everything in the bible is aimed primarily at a jewish people.&#8221;  and I think I will have to disagree with you here.  I think that we could separate the Old Testament from the New and say that the Old speaks to the Jewish people and the New speaks to the gentiles (or perhaps, to a more universal audience.)  but I think that everything in the Bible is aimed and God&#8217;s people.  At times the words are guided towards the Jewish nation and other times it is spoken to a Greek audience, but is always being spoken to God&#8217;s people.</p>
<p>I realize that I often sound like I think I have everything figured out, I&#8217;m sorry if that has been the tone of my reply.  It&#8217;s not what I intended.  I am interested in your thoughts on the pagan influences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts for Easter by cuyler</title>
		<link>http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/thoughts-for-easter/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>cuyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-48</guid>
		<description>while good intentioned, i kind of haven&#039;t ever really been to keen on what the &quot;church fathers&quot; have had to say. for a couple of reasons (and these are things i&#039;ve thought before reading pagan christianity): by 500 ad and at the council of constantinople, roman paganism was already being thoroughly sewn into christianity, changing the jewish and jewish understood context of the bible, and of the things jesus and paul speaking of with a distinctly roman/greek understanding. while good intentioned, they&#039;re not really right.  they can&#039;t help it, and they can&#039;t know/think any other way, but fact is, everything in the bible is aimed primarily at a jewish people. 

second, at the fall of jerusalem, christianity changed hands from jews to gentiles. this mostly relates to the first one and might not even deserve a second divisor, but jewish knowledge was no longer being applied. 

third, all these councils seem to generate are abstractions. it seems rare that they generate practicality. great, wonderful, we have a creed, but what about doing things Jesus said to do? those seem to be relatively creedless. moreover, didn&#039;t Jesus already lay out the highest creed you could have? how are we going to top or make more clear that which was made crystal?

lastly is the fact that the church fathers were the people in position, which means what they show isn&#039;t going to be accurate of the actual climate. much like today. are the majority of christians really as vapid and 2d as the books in christian family would have you believe? no. i think much the same holds for these different councils. while i couldn&#039;t even begin to guess what the &quot;laity&quot; (laity in a great priesthood of believers? how could that be?) were actually thinking/struggling with, but my guess is that it was loosely related to various councils at best. unfortunately, we&#039;ll probably never know since most couldn&#039;t read/write, so there won&#039;t be a wealth of blogs and journals for people to find like there will be with ours.

all this, but i don&#039;t know any better than they did. i just know that i kind of don&#039;t care what they said. i don&#039;t say this lightly, i realize that saying this is about as big as saying &quot;Jesus was a big fake&quot; in a lot of circles. to say the church fathers were wrong is tantamount to outright heresy.

i&#039;m currently seeking a rabbi of some sort so that i can gain the jewish eyes with which to see my world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while good intentioned, i kind of haven&#8217;t ever really been to keen on what the &#8220;church fathers&#8221; have had to say. for a couple of reasons (and these are things i&#8217;ve thought before reading pagan christianity): by 500 ad and at the council of constantinople, roman paganism was already being thoroughly sewn into christianity, changing the jewish and jewish understood context of the bible, and of the things jesus and paul speaking of with a distinctly roman/greek understanding. while good intentioned, they&#8217;re not really right.  they can&#8217;t help it, and they can&#8217;t know/think any other way, but fact is, everything in the bible is aimed primarily at a jewish people. </p>
<p>second, at the fall of jerusalem, christianity changed hands from jews to gentiles. this mostly relates to the first one and might not even deserve a second divisor, but jewish knowledge was no longer being applied. </p>
<p>third, all these councils seem to generate are abstractions. it seems rare that they generate practicality. great, wonderful, we have a creed, but what about doing things Jesus said to do? those seem to be relatively creedless. moreover, didn&#8217;t Jesus already lay out the highest creed you could have? how are we going to top or make more clear that which was made crystal?</p>
<p>lastly is the fact that the church fathers were the people in position, which means what they show isn&#8217;t going to be accurate of the actual climate. much like today. are the majority of christians really as vapid and 2d as the books in christian family would have you believe? no. i think much the same holds for these different councils. while i couldn&#8217;t even begin to guess what the &#8220;laity&#8221; (laity in a great priesthood of believers? how could that be?) were actually thinking/struggling with, but my guess is that it was loosely related to various councils at best. unfortunately, we&#8217;ll probably never know since most couldn&#8217;t read/write, so there won&#8217;t be a wealth of blogs and journals for people to find like there will be with ours.</p>
<p>all this, but i don&#8217;t know any better than they did. i just know that i kind of don&#8217;t care what they said. i don&#8217;t say this lightly, i realize that saying this is about as big as saying &#8220;Jesus was a big fake&#8221; in a lot of circles. to say the church fathers were wrong is tantamount to outright heresy.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m currently seeking a rabbi of some sort so that i can gain the jewish eyes with which to see my world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts for church tonight. by cuyler</title>
		<link>http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2008/03/16/thoughts-for-church-tonight/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>cuyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-43</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ll be honest, i&#039;m dreading tonight a little bit. it&#039;s good to know someone&#039;s looking forward to it. i think that either way, it&#039;ll be good, and this is something that should/needs to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ll be honest, i&#8217;m dreading tonight a little bit. it&#8217;s good to know someone&#8217;s looking forward to it. i think that either way, it&#8217;ll be good, and this is something that should/needs to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts and links: by cuyler</title>
		<link>http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/thoughts-and-links/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>cuyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/thoughts-and-links/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s the thing about podcasts: i would love to listen to them, but i don&#039;t. if i have something to do, i will listen. if i don&#039;t have something to do, it&#039;s very challenging for me to listen. but not &quot;going around the house cleaning up&quot; kind of stuff. i need to be out walking or driving. i figured it&#039;d be good motivation for me to be running. find a really compelling podcast should get me outside and running, right? apparently not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s the thing about podcasts: i would love to listen to them, but i don&#8217;t. if i have something to do, i will listen. if i don&#8217;t have something to do, it&#8217;s very challenging for me to listen. but not &#8220;going around the house cleaning up&#8221; kind of stuff. i need to be out walking or driving. i figured it&#8217;d be good motivation for me to be running. find a really compelling podcast should get me outside and running, right? apparently not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two initial thoughts. by cuyler</title>
		<link>http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/10/29/two-initial-thoughts/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>cuyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/10/29/two-initial-thoughts/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>with the first one i&#039;m having a hard time getting beyond &quot;yes, yes we do effect each other.&quot; 

and i think in some areas we still are actively experimenting. the very idea of having a teaching week followed by discussion is something i&#039;ve never encountered anywhere. perhaps discussing these 6 (7?) topics where it&#039;s taking us a few months to get through creates the illusion of a lack of experimentation since this one experiment is taking quite a bit of time. though with prayer and worship i don&#039;t think we&#039;ve been anything that approximates experimental in some time. sometimes that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s bad. we&#039;ve still had really good times of prayer and worship, but if we were created to experiment, we need to do that. 

them&#039;s my thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with the first one i&#8217;m having a hard time getting beyond &#8220;yes, yes we do effect each other.&#8221; </p>
<p>and i think in some areas we still are actively experimenting. the very idea of having a teaching week followed by discussion is something i&#8217;ve never encountered anywhere. perhaps discussing these 6 (7?) topics where it&#8217;s taking us a few months to get through creates the illusion of a lack of experimentation since this one experiment is taking quite a bit of time. though with prayer and worship i don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ve been anything that approximates experimental in some time. sometimes that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s bad. we&#8217;ve still had really good times of prayer and worship, but if we were created to experiment, we need to do that. </p>
<p>them&#8217;s my thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How the Eat Well Guide has made me question my ecclesiology. by cuyler</title>
		<link>http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/how-the-eat-well-guide-has-made-me-question-my-ecclesiology/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>cuyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/how-the-eat-well-guide-has-made-me-question-my-ecclesiology/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>y&#039;know, i actually didn&#039;t notice the little explanations until you pointed them out. i mean, i noticed them, but i didn&#039;t notice why you were doing them until just now. an probably the best way for the &quot;non converted&quot; to participate with us is to just do it... if they want to. i honestly feel, however, that doing what we do probably feels better and more natural to someone who&#039;s never done it before than a standard church service would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>y&#8217;know, i actually didn&#8217;t notice the little explanations until you pointed them out. i mean, i noticed them, but i didn&#8217;t notice why you were doing them until just now. an probably the best way for the &#8220;non converted&#8221; to participate with us is to just do it&#8230; if they want to. i honestly feel, however, that doing what we do probably feels better and more natural to someone who&#8217;s never done it before than a standard church service would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Marks of a Generous Community by cuyler</title>
		<link>http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/09/18/marks-of-a-generous-community/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>cuyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/09/18/marks-of-a-generous-community/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>when people ask about &quot;the house church thing&quot; i tell them that i&#039;ve never felt more at home. it&#039;s truly such a rewarding and comforting experience. it&#039;s hard to put to words entirely. generosity is indeed a big part of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when people ask about &#8220;the house church thing&#8221; i tell them that i&#8217;ve never felt more at home. it&#8217;s truly such a rewarding and comforting experience. it&#8217;s hard to put to words entirely. generosity is indeed a big part of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How the Eat Well Guide has made me question my ecclesiology. by lauren</title>
		<link>http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/how-the-eat-well-guide-has-made-me-question-my-ecclesiology/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/how-the-eat-well-guide-has-made-me-question-my-ecclesiology/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>in response to the necessity of explaining specifics to the &quot;newbies,&quot; i actually find the process helpful for myself.  i need to be frequently reminded of why we do the things we do.  and i think the process of you wording it aloud ensures that we all (including you, yourself and any personal assumptions) are on the same page.  i personally listen closely to those little explanations.  i appreciate it when i visit churches.  i want to know why we&#039;re doing what we&#039;re doing.  when i went to lookout mountain cc, they would explain every week why we were having communion and what the significance is of the wine and bread.  i think that&#039;s important because it can become so second nature that it loses its significance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in response to the necessity of explaining specifics to the &#8220;newbies,&#8221; i actually find the process helpful for myself.  i need to be frequently reminded of why we do the things we do.  and i think the process of you wording it aloud ensures that we all (including you, yourself and any personal assumptions) are on the same page.  i personally listen closely to those little explanations.  i appreciate it when i visit churches.  i want to know why we&#8217;re doing what we&#8217;re doing.  when i went to lookout mountain cc, they would explain every week why we were having communion and what the significance is of the wine and bread.  i think that&#8217;s important because it can become so second nature that it loses its significance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meditation from Day 31 by cuyler</title>
		<link>http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/09/02/meditation-from-day-31/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>cuyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experimentsinecclesia.wordpress.com/2007/09/02/meditation-from-day-31/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>that actually gave me goosebumps. 
particularly this: would never have been possible if we had not been uprooted completely in ever way. 

from more than just the satellite perspective, from a personal one too. i&#039;m sure many could also say something similar. i went from thinking i had it figured out to pretty well knowing that i know nothing. at any moment, my reason can be robbed and my knowledge corrupted. 

this also: God would send us the workers of His choice. i think that&#039;s already happened and is continuing to happen. 

there&#039;s actually a little too much here to point it. basically, the whole thing is us. confirmation that we&#039;re doing the right thing, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that actually gave me goosebumps.<br />
particularly this: would never have been possible if we had not been uprooted completely in ever way. </p>
<p>from more than just the satellite perspective, from a personal one too. i&#8217;m sure many could also say something similar. i went from thinking i had it figured out to pretty well knowing that i know nothing. at any moment, my reason can be robbed and my knowledge corrupted. </p>
<p>this also: God would send us the workers of His choice. i think that&#8217;s already happened and is continuing to happen. </p>
<p>there&#8217;s actually a little too much here to point it. basically, the whole thing is us. confirmation that we&#8217;re doing the right thing, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
